"Justice takes time. The young woman had finally accepted the procedure annulling her marriage, on 1 April, it was resigned to go any faster. (...) The court in Douai is returned to back, considering that lying on the love life increased from the bride and her virginity (which is not an essential quality in that his absence did not affect married life ") was not a basis for cancellation. To accept disrupt public order. Nevertheless, it is but it would have required that the lack of confidence is attributed to both sides wonder if a lie sentimental about the past of one of the spouses is a good basis for a free marriage based on? equality and mutual respect. The case demonstrates, also paradoxa, a welcome interest for the institution of marriage in a society that tends to s? challenge and in seeking ways make more and easier conditions of separation. The union of one man and one woman is not alone, understand here, a contract to individual clauses but urges, beyond the two spouses, society. "
"To correct its mistakes, justice must sometimes be paradoxical. (...) It is certain that on 1 April, the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Lille had grave errors by saying the cancellation of the marriage of a couple Muslim on the grounds that the woman had lied about her virginity, considered by the judges as "essential". The outcry raised by the ruling discriminatory eligible for moral or religious, had led prosecutors to appeal. It had been suggested the Court of Appeal of Douai to maintain the cancellation citing a reason more "legitimate" as mistaken identity or the lack of cohabitation. The couple, wishing to finish, was also positive. Magistrates, inflexible , Have refused such subterfuge in reversing the first trial. Certainly, justice wanted also to rebuild their virginity by being intractable face of pseudo cultural alibis. Without doubt this ruling extends Does the pain Young married, but he intends to protect other women in an intolerable machismo. The husband "mistake" would have raised an affront to human rights. He recalled there that human rights stop where begins on respect for women. "
"To correct its mistakes, justice must sometimes be paradoxical. (...) It is certain that on 1 April, the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Lille had grave errors by saying the cancellation of the marriage of a couple Muslim on the grounds that the woman had lied about her virginity, considered by the judges as "essential". The outcry raised by the ruling discriminatory eligible for moral or religious, had led prosecutors to appeal. It had been suggested the Court of Appeal of Douai to maintain the cancellation citing a reason more "legitimate" as mistaken identity or the lack of cohabitation. The couple, wishing to finish, was also positive. Magistrates, inflexible , Have refused such subterfuge in reversing the first trial. Certainly, justice wanted also to rebuild their virginity by being intractable face of pseudo cultural alibis. Without doubt this ruling extends Does the pain Young married, but he intends to protect other women in an intolerable machismo. The husband "mistake" would have raised an affront to human rights. He recalled there that human rights stop where begins on respect for women. "
No comments:
Post a Comment